Regulation & ComplianceCross-industryPublished April 17, 2026

The EU Cyber Resilience Act is Forcing a New Security Operating Model

Executive summary

What this whitepaper covers

"Do we have a security program?" was enough to satisfy auditors for years. The EU Cyber Resilience Act asks something harder: "Can you prove this specific product was designed securely?" For most organizations, that evidence is harder to show because reviews happen too late, run inconsistently, and leave no durable record.

The EU CRA becomes fully applicable on December 11, 2027, with key reporting obligations kicking in September 2026. Penalties reach €15M or 2.5% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher. Scope is broader than most teams assume: browser extensions, local agents, CLI tools, embedded software, and SDKs all fall within it.

This whitepaper breaks down what the CRA actually demands and where existing tools like SAST, DAST, and pen-testing fundamentally fall short. It focuses on four operational pillars: secure-by-design practices, vulnerability handling, lifecycle security, and technical evidence.

More importantly, it outlines what CRA readiness looks like in practice with a 90 day plan that moves security review to where the CRA expects it: the design stage, before a single line of code is written.

Key findings

What you'll take away

  • ✦CRA requires proof of secure design. Security reviews after implementation don't satisfy compliance requirements.
  • ✦Most organizations lack design-stage evidence and traceability. Compliance depends on when and how security decisions are made.
  • ✦CRA 4 pillars: secure design, vulnerability handling, lifecycle security, and evidence.
  • ✦Traditional tools (SAST/DAST) operate too late to meet CRA expectations. Evidence must be generated during development, not reconstructed later.
  • ✦Penalties for non-compliance reach up to €15 million or 2.5% of global turnover; reporting obligations begin September 2026.
  • ✦CRA readiness requires process, workflow, and mindset changes — and traceable design-stage evidence embedded directly into existing engineering workflows.
  • ✦Learn how to meet EU CRA requirements with design-stage security reviews before September 2026.
Download

Get the full whitepaper

Downlaod the whitepaper to understand how to adapt your security operating model for the EU CRA

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

When does CRA actually take effect?
Fully applicable December 11, 2027. Key reporting obligations around vulnerability disclosure and incident handling take effect earlier, in September 2026. Product teams should be treating the earlier date as the hard deadline.
Is my product in scope?
Most likely yes. CRA covers browser extensions, local agents, CLI tools, embedded software, and SDKs in addition to the obvious categories. If your product has digital elements and is sold into the EU, assume scope and confirm category.
What does the vulnerability-handling cadence require?
The 24 hour / 72 hour / 14 day cadence covers notification to authorities, coordinated disclosure timelines, and reporting to affected users. Running it as an ad-hoc process does not survive an audit. It needs to be operationalized.
How much lead time do we realistically need?
A 90 day plan gets you to baseline readiness: exposure mapped, operational gaps identified, and a repeatable workflow in place. A full CRA program takes longer, but 90 days is enough to know where you stand and what the next six months need to cover.
Related resources

Keep reading

Security Design Review
Scaling Security Design Reviews in Medical Device Companies: A Modern, Compliant Approach
Medical device software lives under one of the densest regulatory stacks in technology: FDA premarket and postmarket cybersecurity guidance, FDA Section 524B, ISO 13485, the Quality System Regulation, IEC 62304, IEC 81001-5-1, HIPAA, and EU MDR. Audits rarely fault medical device companies for skipping SDR; they fault them for doing SDR inconsistently, with threat models that do not trace cleanly through the Design History File to mitigations, tests, and risk acceptance.
Feb 2026Read whitepaper
Security Design Review
Scale Security Design Reviews (SDR) for Modern AppSec Teams
Shift-left does not fail because developers resist security. It fails because the design stage never gets a seat at the table.
Feb 2026Read whitepaper